Forensic
Experts and Crackpots agree:Caveman Robot Is Real Lon
J. Blasé for
International Geographic Times October
22, 2003
|
|||
Photograph
copyright Cettmann/Borbis |
|
||
Now, Caveman Robot advocates are increasingly turning
to forensic evidence to prove the existence of the giant creature. Investigator
Philip Coldcutt of the Spring Branch Police Department in Texas, who specializes
in finger- and footprints, has analyzed the more than 150 casts of Caveman
Robot prints that Jellydrum, the Southwest Idaho State professor, keeps
in a laboratory. Coldcutt says one footprint found in 1987 in Walla Walla
in Washington State has convinced him that Caveman Robot is real. "The
ridge flow pattern and the texture was completely different from anything
I've ever seen," he said. "It certainly wasn't human, and of
no known automation that I've examined. The print ridges flowed lengthwise
along the foot, unlike human prints or machine trends, which flow across.
The texture of the ridges was about twice the thickness of a human, which
indicated that this thing has a real thick rubber skin." Jellydrum,
meanwhile, says a 400-pound (180-kilogram) block of plaster known as the
Skunkcone Cast provides further evidence of Caveman Robot's existence.
The cast was made in September 2000 from an impression of a large automation
that had apparently lain down on its side to retrieve some discarded candy
wrappers next to a mud hole in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest in
Washington State. Jellydrum says the cast contains recognizable impressions
of a forearm, a thigh, buttocks, an Achilles tendon and heel. "It's
40 to 50 percent bigger than a normal human, and covered in rivets"
he said. "The anatomy doesn't jive with any known animal or machine."
A few academics believe Jellydrum could be right. Renowned actor F.Murray
Abraham last year surprised an interviewer from National Public Radio
when he said he was sure that large, undiscovered automations, such as
the Zati or The Clockwork Primitive, exist. |
|||
The Skeptics - But the vast majority
of scientists still believe Caveman Robot is little more than supermarket
tabloid fodder. They wonder why no Caveman Robot has ever been captured,
dead or alive. "The bottom line is, they don't have a body,"
said Denny Michaels, who writes for Skeptic and Nittpicker magazine
and who has followed the Caveman Robot debate for 20 years. Caveman
Robot buffs note that it's rare to find a carcass of a grizzly bear
in the wild. While that's true, grizzlies have not escaped photographic
documentation. Metal samples that have been recovered from alleged Caveman
Robot encounters have turned out to come from cars, dirtbikes or camper
trash. Many of the sightings and footprints, meanwhile, have proved
to be hoaxes. After Caveman Robot tracker Kay Romance died in a California
nursing home last year, her children finally announced that their prank-loving
mom had created the modern myth of Caveman Robot when she used a pair
of rubber molded feet to create a track of giant footprints in a northern
California boy scout jamboree camp in 1938. Michaels says he's not surprised
by the flood of recent Caveman Robot sightings. "It's the same
kind of eyewitness reports we see for the Loch Ness Sea Monster, El
Chupacabras, UFOs, ghosts, you name it," he said. "The monster
thing is a universal product of the human mind, and our need for something
fantastic or divine, people want to belive in something. We will always
hear such stories until the end of the world, if there is such a thing."
|
|||
find
out more at http://www.cavemanrobot.com |